RSYN RESEARCH FOUNDATION

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
publish:publication_ethics:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
publish:publication_ethics:start [2024/10/15 08:27] – hindiadminpublish:publication_ethics:start [2024/10/15 08:30] (current) – hindiadmin
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 The editorial board is responsible for approving the publication of scientific researches submitted to the journal. Evaluation criteria include: The editorial board is responsible for approving the publication of scientific researches submitted to the journal. Evaluation criteria include:
-- Scientific value +Scientific value 
-- Ethical criteria +Ethical criteria 
-- Scientific research integrity +Scientific research integrity 
-- Language +Language 
-- Citation and plagiarism+Citation and plagiarism
  
 Papers are evaluated regardless of race, gender, religious backgrounds, ethnicity, nationality, and political philosophy. The editorial board is committed to improving the scientific sobriety of the journal through the publication of researches based on their importance, clarity, originality, and accordance with the announced terms and conditions. Papers are evaluated regardless of race, gender, religious backgrounds, ethnicity, nationality, and political philosophy. The editorial board is committed to improving the scientific sobriety of the journal through the publication of researches based on their importance, clarity, originality, and accordance with the announced terms and conditions.
Line 66: Line 66:
  
 Authors must comply with the "publication policy" regulations and the journal's approved writing style. Manuscripts should provide: Authors must comply with the "publication policy" regulations and the journal's approved writing style. Manuscripts should provide:
-- Clarity of aim +Clarity of aim 
-- Accurate and sequential presentation of results +Accurate and sequential presentation of results 
-- Discussion of results to fulfil research aims +Discussion of results to fulfil research aims 
-- Objective justification of the research method +Objective justification of the research method 
-- Work details and modern scientific references+Work details and modern scientific references
  
 Manuscripts should not include results stated in other researches. Inclusion of forged or stolen results is considered unethical and unacceptable. Manuscripts should not include results stated in other researches. Inclusion of forged or stolen results is considered unethical and unacceptable.
Line 94: Line 94:
 ### 5.1 Identification of Unethical Behavior ### 5.1 Identification of Unethical Behavior
  
-- Misconduct and unethical behavior may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone. +Misconduct and unethical behavior may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone. 
-- Misconduct and unethical behavior may include, but are not limited to, examples outlined in this document.+Misconduct and unethical behavior may include, but are not limited to, examples outlined in this document.
  
 ### 5.2 Investigation ### 5.2 Investigation
  
-- An initial decision should be taken by the editor, who should consult with or seek advice from the publisher, if appropriate. +An initial decision should be taken by the editor, who should consult with or seek advice from the publisher, if appropriate. 
-- Evidence should be gathered, while avoiding spreading any allegations beyond those who need to know.+Evidence should be gathered, while avoiding spreading any allegations beyond those who need to know.
  
 ### 5.3 Minor Breaches ### 5.3 Minor Breaches
  
-- Minor misconduct might be dealt with without the need for a formal investigation. +Minor misconduct might be dealt with without the need for a formal investigation. 
-- In any event, the author should be given the opportunity to respond to any allegations.+In any event, the author should be given the opportunity to respond to any allegations.
  
 ### 5.4 Serious Breaches ### 5.4 Serious Breaches
  
-- Serious misconduct might require that the employers of the accused be notified. +Serious misconduct might require that the employers of the accused be notified. 
-- The editor, in consultation with the publisher or Society as appropriate, should make the decision whether or not to involve the employers.+The editor, in consultation with the publisher or Society as appropriate, should make the decision whether or not to involve the employers.
  
 ## 6. Outcomes of Unethical Behavior (in increasing order of severity) ## 6. Outcomes of Unethical Behavior (in increasing order of severity)
  
-- Informing or educating the author or reviewer where there appears to be a misunderstanding or misapplication of acceptable standards. +  * Informing or educating the author or reviewer where there appears to be a misunderstanding or misapplication of acceptable standards. 
-- A more strongly worded letter to the author or reviewer covering the misconduct and as a warning to future behavior. +  * A more strongly worded letter to the author or reviewer covering the misconduct and as a warning to future behavior. 
-- Publication of a formal notice detailing the misconduct. +  * Publication of a formal notice detailing the misconduct. 
-- Publication of an editorial detailing the misconduct. +  * Publication of an editorial detailing the misconduct. 
-- A formal letter to the head of the author's or reviewer's department or funding agency. +  * A formal letter to the head of the author's or reviewer's department or funding agency. 
-- Formal retraction or withdrawal of a publication from the journal, in conjunction with informing the head of the author or reviewer's department, Abstracting & Indexing services and the readership of the publication. +  * Formal retraction or withdrawal of a publication from the journal, in conjunction with informing the head of the author or reviewer's department, Abstracting & Indexing services and the readership of the publication. 
-- Imposition of a formal embargo on contributions from an individual for a defined period. +  * Imposition of a formal embargo on contributions from an individual for a defined period. 
-- Reporting the case and outcome to a professional organization or higher authority for further investigation and action.+  * Reporting the case and outcome to a professional organization or higher authority for further investigation and action.
  
 ## 7. Conclusion ## 7. Conclusion
publish/publication_ethics/start.1728980866.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/10/15 08:27 by hindiadmin
Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki